Georgia Medical Malpractice Lawyer Directory: Atlanta
Atlanta anchors Georgia’s largest metropolitan area and its densest concentration of hospitals, academic medical centers, and specialty practices, which is also where the bulk of the state’s medical malpractice litigation arises. Claims here range from surgical errors and misdiagnosis to birth injuries, medication and anesthesia mistakes, emergency room negligence, and hospital-acquired infections. What sets these cases apart from ordinary injury claims is the expert affidavit that Georgia law requires at the very start of the lawsuit.
Anyone weighing a medical malpractice claim in Georgia should understand two features that set these cases apart from ordinary injury claims. First, O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 requires an expert affidavit to be filed WITH the complaint, identifying at least one negligent act or omission by the provider and its factual basis; a complaint filed without it is generally subject to dismissal, which makes early expert review essential. Second, the plaintiff must prove the provider departed from the standard of care, meaning the degree of skill and care ordinarily used by the profession generally under similar conditions (O.C.G.A. § 51-1-27), and that the departure caused the harm. Most claims must be filed within two years under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71, subject to a five-year statute of repose under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-73, and emergency-room care is judged by a higher gross-negligence standard under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.5.
The directory below lists five Atlanta firms that handle medical malpractice cases, each verified from a dedicated medical malpractice page on the firm’s own official website. It is organized for comparison rather than ranking, so the entries focus on practice areas, attorney background, office locations, and founding history rather than promotional claims.
1. Davis Adams, LLC
- Focus: Medical malpractice (exclusive focus)
- Fee structure: Free consultation, contingency
- Web: https://davis-adams.com/areas-we-serve/atlanta-medical-malpractice-lawyer/
Davis Adams maintains a site concentrated on medical malpractice, and it is unusual in stating that it represents medical malpractice victims exclusively, which is why its site carries no general personal injury content. The page urges prospective clients to ask any lawyer what percentage of the firm’s caseload is actually medical malpractice, framing that specialization as the firm’s core distinction, indicating a strongly focused med-mal emphasis.
The practice is built around medical malpractice. Any references to past results are firm-reported and have not been independently confirmed against court records.
2. The Moses Firm
- Attorney: Moses Kim (founding attorney)
- Focus: Medical malpractice (concentrated focus)
- Fee structure: Free consultation
- Web: https://www.themosesfirm.com/georgia-medical-malpractice-attorney/
The Moses Firm maintains a site concentrated on plaintiff-side medical malpractice. The page frames the team’s combined experience across both the medicine and the law and its work with leading medical experts to prepare each case, indicating a concentrated med-mal emphasis. The firm describes itself as a plaintiffs’ medical malpractice practice serving Georgia.
The practice concentrates on medical malpractice. The firm’s references to hundreds of millions in verdicts and settlements are firm-reported and have not been independently confirmed against court records.
3. Malone Law
- Focus: Medical malpractice, catastrophic injury
- Fee structure: Free consultation
- Web: https://malonelaw.com/atlanta-medical-malpractice-lawyer/
Malone Law maintains a dedicated Atlanta medical malpractice page on its site, and it is among the more statute-specific pages reviewed here. The page explains the medical standard of care as the generally accepted practice of the medical community, describes how expert witnesses establish it, and states that Georgia requires an expert affidavit at the initiation of a lawsuit or the case may be dismissed, indicating strong med-mal-specific depth.
The practice handles medical malpractice alongside catastrophic injury. Any references to past results are firm-reported and have not been independently confirmed against court records.
4. The Fitzpatrick Firm, LLC
- Focus: Medical malpractice, broader personal injury
- Fee structure: Free consultation
- Web: https://personalinjuryatl.com/practice-areas/medical-malpractice-lawyer
The Fitzpatrick Firm maintains a dedicated Atlanta medical malpractice page on its site. The page sets out the four elements a Georgia court evaluates and states plainly that a malpractice suit cannot even be commenced unless a physician’s affidavit setting out the defendant’s negligence is attached to the complaint, indicating a med-mal-aware emphasis grounded in the affidavit requirement.
The practice handles medical malpractice alongside broader personal injury. Any references to past results are firm-reported and have not been independently confirmed against court records.
5. DGL Attorneys At Law
- Phone: (770) 404-8239
- Focus: Medical malpractice, broader personal injury
- Fee structure: Free consultation
- Web: https://www.dglattorneys.com/practice-areas/medical-malpractice/
DGL Attorneys At Law maintains a dedicated medical malpractice page on its site. The page names surgical errors and birth injuries among the claims it pursues and describes arranging expert testimony and negotiating with insurers, indicating a med-mal-aware emphasis within a broader injury practice.
The firm handles medical malpractice within a broader personal injury practice. Any results it cites are firm-reported and have not been independently checked against court records.
After Suspected Medical Malpractice in Atlanta: Practical Notes
Two features shape most Atlanta medical malpractice claims: the expert affidavit that must accompany the complaint under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1, and the standard-of-care proof required under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-27. Because a qualified expert must review the records and sign an affidavit before the case can be filed, these claims are screened far more rigorously than ordinary injury cases, and the two-year limitations period under O.C.G.A. § 9-3-71 makes early review important.
The expert affidavit requirement under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 is the single biggest practical difference between a medical malpractice claim and an ordinary injury claim. Because the affidavit of a qualified expert must accompany the complaint, a firm typically must obtain and pay for medical records and expert review before it can even file, which is one reason these cases are screened carefully and taken on a contingency basis. Common claims involve surgical errors, misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis (cancer in particular), birth injuries, medication and anesthesia errors, emergency room negligence, and hospital-acquired infections. When malpractice causes death, the matter can become a wrongful death case, and the 2025 tort reform law (Senate Bill 68) changed how certain evidence and damages arguments are presented at trial.
When comparing the firms above, useful points of distinction include whether the office shows genuine med-mal-specific depth (the O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1 affidavit, the standard-of-care framework, the statute of repose, the emergency-care gross-negligence rule) versus a general injury practice, whether medical malpractice is an exclusive or concentrated focus or one of many areas, whether it is a single Atlanta-area office or a multi-office firm, and the size and tenure of the attorney team. None of the entries here is endorsed or ranked; the list is a verified starting point for an Atlanta family’s own research.
Note: This list is not a ranking and makes no “best” claim. Many more attorneys handle medical malpractice cases in the area. The five firms above are verified records, each confirmed from a dedicated medical malpractice page on the firm’s own official website (the Web link for each entry points to that page, not just the home page). Where a street address is not published on the firm’s own site, it is omitted rather than taken from a third-party listing. Firm-reported results have not been independently confirmed against court records. This directory is general information about Georgia law and individual firms, not legal advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship; the legal points summarized here reflect general Georgia law as of the date below and can change or be affected by recent reforms, so an injured person should confirm how current law applies to their own situation with a licensed Georgia attorney. Data current as of June 6, 2026.